High-Altitude Radiowave Echoes Indicate Thickness of Glass
May 15, 2016 16:20:35 GMT
Joshua Alvarez likes this
Post by asx777 on May 15, 2016 16:20:35 GMT
High-Altitude Daytime Radar Echoes Demonstrate Thickness of Glass Sphere
Written by Daniel – 15.05.2016 (edited after review 17.05.2016)
Abstract. In this paper I collect the first-hand information regarding the new theory of high altitude echoes in order to document and create a foundation for further research. It’s dealing with my proposal, initial thoughts of forum members, an explanation of what we can derive from this theory, what type of refutations we can perform, what type of evidence we currently have and the situation. This theory seeks to solve the uncertainty surrounding the thicknessand the properties of the glass sky, as well as rainbows, the celestial sphere and others. In this paper I discuss the possibility that the thickness of the primary glass sphere can be derived from peculiar radar echo studies performed in the Jicamarca Radio Observatory in 1962, which were brought to the table by JMAC. Information about the glass sphere has always been a topic of discussion due to it’s importance when it comes to light refraction and basically the entire structure of the concave model: everything from tektites, megacryometeors to iron meteorites with tektite-like glass. According to Jalvarez we can derive the location of the sun, the location of the celestial sphere from this theory – considering it’s accurate.
Introduction. In the study, radio echoes were present on altitudes anywhere from 130 km to 160 km and only during daytime – it appearead at dawn and intesified mid-day then began to decrease at noon. Upward movement in the picture below the final section show a descrease in intensity. The intensity increases the lower the altitude – it’s because of this that I move my focus to the starting altitude of 130 km reported, more on the higher altitudes in the hypothesis section. Initially I dismissed the notion that the glass sky could be causing the reflection due a non existent echo during the night + altitude higher than the commonly accepted altitude of the glass, with a maximum of about 100 km due to various observations such as atmospheric elves. Theories began to emerge within Wild Heretic’s forum that the radio waves bounced back and forth from the sun to the earth, even the existence of a secondary glass existing much closer than previously thought was proposed and implications for light bending became significant. However, reading the article of the study further I came across the metaphorical statement «the sun takes charge» and I was reminded of the electrical properties that exist in WH’s model of the sun and otherwise. I considered the possiblity that the sun charges the glass and this in turn causes the echo that is observed.
Hypothesis. In this hypothesis I propose that the sun charges the (by concave model) inner layer of the primary glass sphere, providing a temporary daytime reflective property thus causing the radar echoes that were observed at the Jicamarca Radio Observatory. This interpretation of the data would explain why such observations are only made during day time with nothing arriving during night time, as the sun is not present. It would explain why there is a high altitude radio echo instead of the commonly accepted altitude of approximately 100 km for the primary glass sky -- only the inner layer of the glass is under exposure. From this, one can conclude that the thickness of the glass is approximately 30 km, with a possibly of lesser thickness due to experimental margin of error such as the unaccounted time for the radiowave travel through the glass sky towards it's inner layer where it's reflected + since the glass is probably of the LDG type, which has a refraction index of (1.46) this would make the actual thickness of the glass equal 20.5 km. The main problem with this theory, as pointed out by Wild Heretic, is re-entry and meteorites. Some may also say that the much less intense echoes observed at higher altitudes than 130 km do not agree with my theory. I currently have no official explanation, however, my thought is that the concave curvature of the glass is responsible for this phenomena: scientists observe weak radar echoes at higher altitudes because the glass is physically higher either to the east, west, north or south of them -- the lowest altitude (and the correct one) is directly overhead, mid-day, hence the reason the most intense echoes are observed mid-day.
Possible Refutations. If it could be demonstrated, through a video or indirect indication, that a rocket or space craft successfully broke through the glass sphere using nothing but it’s speed and the strength of it’s nose cone – I would consider this theory falsified, due to the impossibility of breaking through such a thick glass in a swift movement without explosive or otherwise extreme exercises of power. Calculations on the degree of chromatic dispersion as mentioned by Primalredemption may also contribute to the refuting of this hypothesis -- as well as structural integrity and physical stress testing of the glass. Assuming that the rainbows are related to the primary glass sky, one could perform measurement of ratios in double rainbows and compare these measurements with the predicted ratio (1.30) for the beginning of 100km and ending of 130 km. It should be noted, however, that inversion in the double rainbow should be taken into account and the measurements should concentrate on the blue frequency for accurate data.
Summary. In summary of this writing, the concave community is as of now uncertain when it comes to the thickness of the primary glass sphere, the altitude of the sun and the workings of the rainbow as well as bending of light. By receiving information on the thickness of the primary glass sphere through the success of this hypothesis, mysteries previously unanswered may see a light in the tunnel as investigations sometimes only require one piece of the puzzle to understand how a mechanism or system (such as the concave model) operates. This hypothesis is fairly simplistic and may require revisions over time due to inaccuracies. It's subject to testing through different experiments such as the one mentioned in the hypothesis section of the writing, where a person assumes that rainbows are a direct property of the glass sky and perform comparative analysis to confirm the proposed hypothesis.
Summary. In summary of this writing, the concave community is as of now uncertain when it comes to the thickness of the primary glass sphere, the altitude of the sun and the workings of the rainbow as well as bending of light. By receiving information on the thickness of the primary glass sphere through the success of this hypothesis, mysteries previously unanswered may see a light in the tunnel as investigations sometimes only require one piece of the puzzle to understand how a mechanism or system (such as the concave model) operates. This hypothesis is fairly simplistic and may require revisions over time due to inaccuracies. It's subject to testing through different experiments such as the one mentioned in the hypothesis section of the writing, where a person assumes that rainbows are a direct property of the glass sky and perform comparative analysis to confirm the proposed hypothesis.
Source of picture and discovery: news.discovery.com/space/mystery-of-bizarre-radar-echoes-solved-50-years-later-160513.htm
